Browse 96223 posts in chronological order — 37364 from Truth Social, 58859 from X — with direct links to originals and topic search pages.
Snapshot for Thursday, September 3 in Europe/Rome time.
Open detail WOW! This morning, in NEVADA. See you tonight, thank you! https:// rumble.com/v1mvqae-live-presid ent-donald-j.-trump-in-minden-nv.html
Open detail RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109128114236284059 Georgia - Vote for Mike Collins!
Open detail RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/109128137184053986 Texas - Vote for Keith Self!
Open detail https:// rumble.com/v1mtcnk-the-right-v iew-with-lara-trump-and-president-donald-j.-trump.html
Open detail RT @realDonaldTrump https://www. rsbnetwork.com/news/trump-says -the-silent-majority-is-back-and-hes-right/
Open detail “Brazil's Bolsonaro says ally Trump would have averted war in Ukraine” https://www. reuters.com/world/brazils-bols onaro-says-ally-trump-would-have-averted-war-ukraine-2022-10-07/
Deleted
Open detail See you tomorrow, NEVADA! \n https://events.donaldjtrump.com/events /save-america-rally-in-minden-nv?_ga=2.90598995.854406331.1665175166-1669782161.1664552535
Open detail TRUTH is “hot”! https://www. foxbusiness.com/politics/truth -social-now-available-samsung-galaxy-store
Open detail https://www. rasmussenreports.com/public_co ntent/politics/general_politics/september_2022/election_integrity_61_say_issue_is_very_important
Open detail RT @Rasmussen_Poll How likely is it that cheating affected the outcome of the 2020 presidential election? \nLikely / Not likely: \nAll: 55% / 40%\nRep: 75% / 20%\nDem: 35% / 61%\nInd: 53% / 40%\nWhite: 52% / 42%\nBlack: 55% / 40%\nHisp: 62% / 35%\n18-39: 55% / 30%\n65+: 49% / 45% \n https:// bit.ly/3V2WvcM
Open detail RT @marklevinshow Hillar Clinton’s illegal private server contained a lot of top secret information \n https://www. npr.org/2016/01/29/464811045/a s-iowa-caucuses-near-clinton-email-probe-persists
Open detail RT @marklevinshow 2. Furthermore, have any of these officials violated federal law while in office; that is, mishandled classified information while serving in office? How about current and former staff? Answer: We have no idea.