74 posts: 74 on Truth Social, 0 on X. First at 12:13 AM, last at 10:27 PM (US Eastern Time). The most reposted post of the day, with 6,579 reposts: “KANGAROO COURT! A CORRUPT AND CONFLICTED JUDGE. RELIANCE ON COUNSEL (ADVISE OF COUNSEL) NOT ALLOWED BY MERCHAN, A FIRST. HIS RULINGS, ON A C…”
Open detail I DIDN’T HAVE A FIXER, I HAD A LAWYER WHO, AT THAT TIME, WAS FULLY ACCREDITED AND ACCEPTED WITHIN THE LEGAL COMMUNITY, BUT THE JUDGE IS NOT ALLOWING ME TO USE THE RELIANCE ON COUNSEL DEFENSE. I MAY BE THE ONLY PERSON IN THE COUNTRY NOT ALLOWED TO DO SO AND, THE ONLY ONE WHO HAS A VERY UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND RESTRICTIVE GAG ORDER. NOT FAIR — FREEDOM!
Open detail CAN YOU IMAGINE THAT I, AS A DEFENDANT, AM NOT ALLOWED TO REBUT OR CORRECT THE MANY LIES TOLD DURUNG THE 5 HOUR FILIBUSTER JUST PUT ON BY THE SOROS BACKED D.A.’s OFFICE IN THE MANHATTAN COURT. WHAT A DISGRACEFUL PERFORMANCE OF MISREPRESENTATION IT WAS!!! MAGA2024
Open detail I never knew how small, both mentally and physically, Wacko Former Actor Robert De Niro was. Today, De Niro, who suffers from an incurable case of TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME, commonly known in the medical community as TDS, was met, outside the Courthouse, with a force far greater than the Radical Left - MAGA. Robert, whose movies, artistry, and brand have gone WAY DOWN IN VALUE since he entered the political arena at the request of Crooked Joe Biden, looked so pathetic and sad out there. Where have you gone Joe DiMaggio!!!
Open detail KANGAROO COURT! A CORRUPT AND CONFLICTED JUDGE. RELIANCE ON COUNSEL (ADVISE OF COUNSEL) NOT ALLOWED BY MERCHAN, A FIRST. HIS RULINGS, ON A CASE THAT SHOULD, ACCORDING TO ALL LEGAL SCHOLARS AND EXPERTS, NEVER HAVE BEEN BROUGHT, HAVE MADE THIS A BIDEN PUSHED WITCH HUNT. THERE WAS NO CRIME, EXCEPT FOR THE BUM THAT GOT CAUGHT STEALING FROM ME! IN GOD WE TRUST!
Open detail THE D.A.’s OFFICE WAS ALLOWED TO GO ON WITH 5 HOURS OF BULL…. YESTERDAY. I have no rights against this Crooked Judge’s Gag Order!
Open detail Gregg Jarrett: “They manipulated the justice system to create this illusion of wrongdoing…”
Open detail Gregg Jarrett: "This Case against Donald Trump is Election Interference and Brazen Lawfare."
Open detail Gregg Jarrett: "The element of the alleged crimes were never proven in this Case - Business Records were not false, they were accurate. Trump had no involvement, there's no evidence he willfully violated Election Laws, and no Laws were even broken. Plus, it's factually impossible to influence an Election after it's over, yet that's how the Indictment reads...Where is the crime? It's nowhere! This is what I call a Bigfoot Case. It's a Trial in search of an imaginary crime."
Open detail Andrew Cherkasky: “When you can't explain the crime, sometimes that's the evidence of innocence in and of its own right - When you charge them with something, and then you're waiting, and you're waiting, and you never get to it. That's the idea that the person was innocent all along.”
Open detail Byron York: “Prosecutors did not prove that Trump, intending to defraud, caused false company records to be made, starting in Feb 2017. They never proved that he did it or told anybody to do it. And if they did not prove that, it’s over.”
Open detail Trial Attorney Randy Zelin, CNN: “There is reasonable doubt all over this case.”
Open detail Mark O'Mara, CNN Legal Analyst: “Four hour closing argument is way too long ... Making it more complicated, there’s reasonable doubt."
Open detail Mike Davis: “When CNN’s Jake Tapper is even admitting that the prosecution has failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt, you know it's a bad day for the prosecution.”
Open detail Caroline Polisi, CBS Mornings: “Trump himself didn’t go on the drop down menu and say these were reimbursements or retainer fee.”
Open detail Bill O’Reilly: “There is zero evidence he even thought about campaign funding statutes. Repeat. Zero evidence. In order to convict, there has to be ‘criminal intent,’ as the nation saw with the Hillary Clinton private email thing. So, simple man that I am, I can't see a conviction.”
Open detail Gregg Jarrett: “There is no credible evidence that Trump engineered or even knew about booking entries by accountants that were not false at all. Nor is there any plausible evidence that he willfully violated campaign laws that were not violations at all. Where is the fraud that prosecutors argued in their opening statement? Like Bigfoot, it’s a fictitious missing link in the case. This has always been a trial in search of an imaginary crime and a disgraceful charade. This case has reasonable doubt written all over it.”
Open detail David Gelman, Fox Business: “Alvin Bragg didn’t want to try this case. The only reason he did it is because former D.A.’s in his Office went and wrote a book pretty much saying, ‘Hey Alvin, you should do this because it’s political’…Nothing has been proven here. That’s why I keep [saying] there should be a directed verdict, meaning the Judge should take it out of the jury’s hands, and say, ‘Prosecution, you did not meet your burden, you did not find that there is a crime here. Donald Trump, go home, go campaign.’”
Open detail Leo Terrell: “This is not a courtroom…It is not legal. I’ve been in court for 30 plus years and what is happening in New York, the Democrats, they have hijacked the legal system, and it is outright embarrassing to lawyers.”
Open detail Newt Gingrich: “In New York we have a corrupt judge and a corrupt district attorney creating a corrupt trial trying to frame President Trump.”
Open detail Doug Collins, Fox News: “Number one we should have never been here to start with. This is a prosecution in search of a crime. It's not there. Donald Trump didn't do anything.”
Open detail Jim Trusty: “That is unlike any trial I could ever think of that you go through the entire trial, and it's still an open question of how this is a felony case.”
Open detail Senator Tom Cotton: “If the judge wanted to redeem his reputation and credibility he would direct a verdict of not guilty today for the former president.”
Open detail Michael Goodwin, The New York Post: “As even CNN commentator Fareed Zakaria put it, ‘I doubt the New York indictment would have been brought against a defendant whose name was not Donald Trump.’ What a damning indictment of New York! Bragg once shared the same opinion of the flawed case, dropping the long-running probe soon after taking office in 2022. That put him in good company, with the Federal Election Commission, New York federal prosecutors and his predecessor all previously passing on the case.”
Open detail Andy McCarthy: “NDAs are legal. An intent to defraud cannot be derived from the performance of a legal act.”
Open detail Jonathan Turley: “Abstract artist Jackson Pollock once said that his paintings have no objective meaning, so the best way for people to enjoy them is to stop looking for it. For many of us, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has created a new school of abstract law…Bragg started with nothing and sold it as a legal abstraction.”
Open detail Kash Patel: “ @realDonaldTrump ’s case is littered with reasonable doubt because he is not guilty- there is no crime. He is [an] innocent man.”
Open detail Criminal Defense Attorney David W. Fischer, “The prosecution has not established that a criminal offense took place.”
Open detail Mother Teresa could not beat these charges. These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged!
Open detail I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE CHARGES ARE IN THIS RIGGED CASE—I AM ENTITLED TO SPECIFICITY JUST LIKE ANYONE ELSE. THERE IS NO CRIME!
Open detail IT IS RIDICULOUS, UNCONSTITUTIONAL, AND UNAMERICAN that the highly Conflicted, Radical Left Judge is not requiring a unanimous decision on the fake charges against me brought by Soros backed D.A. Alvin Bragg. A THIRD WORLD ELECTION INTERFERENCE HOAX!
Open detail Congratulations to United States Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito for showing the INTELLIGENCE, COURAGE, and “GUTS” to refuse stepping aside from making a decision on anything January 6th related. All U.S. Judges, Justices, and Leaders should have such GRIT - Our Country would be far more advanced than its current status as A BADLY FAILING NATION, headed by the Worst President in American History, Crooked Joe Biden!
Open detail According to the Legal Scholars and Experts, the Jury Instructions, given by a highly Conflicted Judge, will go down as the most biased and unfair in Judicial History. Biden Witch Hunt. Election Interference!!!
Open detail Crooked Joe Biden just announced that he will speak, for a change, at the end of his trial against me. Yesterday he sent his mentally challenged servant, former actor Robert De Niro, to create a little chaos in front of the Courthouse, and to influence the trial. Election Interference!!!
Open detail RT @realDonaldTrump Mother Teresa could not beat these charges. These charges are rigged. The whole thing is rigged!
Open detail Jim Trusty: “As a prosecutor, that judgment has really widened the playing field here by saying there doesn't need to be unanimous agreement.”
Open detail I never knew Shannon Bream was so “naïve.” In her interview with my Representative, Alina Habba, Shannon just suggested that Crooked Joe Biden was not involved in my Show Trial. HOW STUPID! Not only is he involved, he is virtually leading it, and all of the other Trials as well - Meaning, his people, because he’s not mentally sharp enough to lead anything! Just take a look at the DOJ/White House Thugs involved, and everything else. Biden is incompetent, and feels that Weaponization is the only way he can win. He’s counting on the Shannon Breams of the World to get him there. Bad day for Shannon!
Open detail RT @marklevinshow The grotesque trial charade gets even worse this morning. \nThe Stalinist clown judge directed the jury that they can choose among three areas of crimes to convict the former president: \n1. Violations of federal election law (which no one in that courtroom is familiar with, and the judge specifically prevents Brad Smith from testifying about); \n2. The falsification of business records; and \n3. Tax violations \nOf course, the issue for all of the above is the requirement of a criminal intent. \nFurthermore, the idea that jurors can pick 1 of the 3, and they don't have to unanimously agree on which of the three, is another shocking development. \nMoreover, the federal campaign violation has still not been defined.
Open detail Neil Cavuto and Shannon Bream should team up and do a Show together. The Ratings wouldn’t be good, because they’re anti-MAGA, but it’s not all about the Ratings!
Open detail Greg Gutfeld: “No one knows what the crime is, but it’s the trial - That is the crime. What is interesting about this is it paints Trump in an incredibly appealing way. He’s up against the wall. Meanwhile, Joe Biden needs a wall to stand up on. And this guy, he’s best when he’s angry, and he’s focused, and he’s direct. When you compare the way he is, and that kind of energy to what is in the White House now, it’s persuasive. I mean, you look at this guy, and you go, ‘I get it, that guy’s pissed off, and he’s clear.’ Meanwhile, this guy speaks in these amorphous fantasies about ‘a threat to Democracy.’ He can’t solve anything. He doesn’t know what’s going on, and this guy is fighting for his life. I mean, it’s a pretty stark choice for Americans if they‘re paying attention to this, but maybe most of them, they’re tuned out, because they know this is all B.S.”
Open detail Judge Jeanine Pirro: “This is a kangaroo court…It was a sad day for me. I sat with Andy McCarthy and Jonathan Turley and Trey Gowdy, and we were all like ‘This is unheard of.’”
Open detail Thank you Kevin!\n \nKevin O’Leary: “If I polled 10,000 Independent Voters right now, let’s say I could just wave a magic wand and do that on a panel, I bet you after all of these six weeks, whatever it’s been, even if you watch the synopsis every night on the News somewhere, whatever outlet you watch, you are still 99% totally confused on what the hell is going on…IT’S BAD FOR THE AMERICAN BRAND!”
Open detail Greg Gutfeld: “We were told for, I don’t know, three years, that ‘No one is above the law,’ but they were saying that because they were making sure that Trump was below the Law. They didn’t raise the bar for him, they lowered it, and so you are prosecuting the current Leading Candidate with an unprecedented theory that is so difficult to follow that nobody knows what’s going on. Wouldn’t you want to streamline this, and make it the best possible, most persuasive argument possible since this is the leading Presidential Candidate?”
Open detail Jesse Watters: “This is a case with a crime they won’t tell you, and it’s not even in the D.A.’s jurisdiction, but the jury can pick whatever crime they want, and they can all disagree on the crime, and it’s still a unanimous decision…It’s like a buffet!”
Open detail Tammy Bruce: “With everything we’ve seen with how the American People have responded to this unfairness, we don’t like unfairness. The Country is built on a blind Justice System…It is not a game.”
Open detail Monica Crowley: “They're so deeply invested in this lawfare because they believed it was going to neutralize Donald Trump...and it's only strengthened him...this pile on is completely unjustified…”
Open detail Senator J.D. Vance: “Democrats are shredding 250 years of constitutional tradition to go after their political opponent…”
Open detail Stephen Miller: “Even though it is Donald Trump on trial, it is Joe Biden & the Democrat Communist prosecutors who are facing the judgment of history—and who will incur the wrath of the American voter.”
