Post detail

Truth Social post from Sunday, March 31, 2024

Truth Social Sunday, March 31, 2024 5:54 PM

Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus, firmly in the liberal camp and firmly anti-Trump, expressed worries about the precedent the Trump case could set. From her column this week: “The essence of Trump’s argument on appeal is that the supposed harm he caused was minimal at best — all his lenders were repaid — and that the penalty levied against him was therefore wildly excessive. The conundrum is that the very size of the judgment, and the consequent size of the bond that Trump is required to post, might make him unable to appeal. Trump could pursue his case, but in the meantime, James would be entitled to seize and sell off the former president’s assets. That can’t be right. It would mean that the more outrageous and disproportionate a damages award is, the harder it is to appeal.”

Likes 12,966

Reposts 3,240

Score 0

Open the original post ↗

Truth Social post from Sunday, March 31, 2024

Similar tweets and posts