Read top to bottom: each phase shows the position at that point in time, and each turning point explains the shift from the previous phase to the next one.
Posts analyzed694
Phases16
Turning points8
Coverage2011–2026
Over fifteen years (2011-2026), Trump's position on Iran remained ideologically consistent at its core — Iran as an existential threat, an illegitimate regime, an obstacle to Middle Eastern stability — but underwent radical transformations in communicative register and strategic approach. From an outside critic of Obama (2011-2016), to the president who enacted Maximum Pressure and withdrew from the JCPOA (2017-2020), to direct military escalation including strikes on nuclear sites (2025-2026), culminating in a ceasefire and diplomatic opening framed around regime change. Iran was used systematically as a tool to attack Democrats, as a benchmark for Trump's self-proclaimed superior dealmaking ability, and ultimately as a stage for his personal victory narrative.
Phase 012011-2012
hawkish observer
Iran as a nuclear and regional threat that the Obama administration is too weak to confront. The topic is used as indirect political criticism.
Trump, still a non-political public figure, frames Iran as an immediate nuclear danger requiring strong action ('by any and all means necessary'). He criticizes Obama's lack of resolve and links Iran to Iraqi oil and American weakness. The tone is that of an outside commentator who knows better than those in power. Vocabulary is military and deterrence-focused.
Trump, still a non-political public figure, frames Iran as an immediate nuclear danger requiring strong action ('by any and all means necessary'). He criticizes Obama's lack of resolve and links Iran to Iraqi oil and American weakness. The tone is that of an outside commentator who knows better than those in power. Vocabulary is military and deterrence-focused.
↔
After2013-2014
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
Iran as a negotiating partner to be dealt with from a position of strength. Obama is portrayed as an incompetent and desperate negotiator. Trump presents himself as a master dealmaker. The Iran-Iraq-oil triad becomes a recurring refrain.
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
↔
After2015-2016
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
Obama's Iran deal as a 'disaster', 'humiliation', 'deal of weakness'. The topic is actively used in the presidential campaign as a symbol of Democratic incompetence. Iran appears on lists of 'Hillary's failures' and as proof of American weakness on the world stage.
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
With the nuclear deal imminent and then signed in July 2015, Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. He ceased being an outside commentator and became an anti-deal activist, physically attending the protest rally in Washington.
Before2013-2014
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
↔
After2015-2016
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
↔
After2017
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
Iran as a regime strengthened by Obama that must now be contained. The frame of 'Iran on its last legs before the deal' emerges. Trump begins using the topic to delegitimize internal opponents (Corker). Language becomes more presidential but retains aggression.
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
↔
After2018
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
JCPOA withdrawal as an act of historical correction. Iran as a terrorist state to be 'choked off'. Maximum Pressure presented as a superior alternative to the deal. Obama as the primary scapegoat. Kerry is attacked for continuing 'shadow diplomacy'.
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
Formal JCPOA withdrawal. The May 8, 2018 White House post inaugurates the Maximum Pressure phase as state policy, no longer merely a personal position. The frame shifts from 'Obama is wrong' to 'I am correcting this'.
Before2017
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
↔
After2018
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
↔
After2019
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
Iran under maximum pressure but with the door open to negotiation. Oscillation between war-like tones ('be careful with the threats') and signals of dialogue readiness ('sanctions come off... they become productive'). The hostage issue returns as a negotiating lever.
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
↔
After2020
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
January 2020 is the hottest moment: Soleimani's killing, Iranian missile retaliation, war risk. Trump manages the narrative publicly with near-real-time posts. First a war frame ('we will strike back'), then de-escalation ('all is well'), then support for the Iranian people against the regime.
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
The Soleimani killing is the first direct kinetic act against Iran. Posts become real-time war dispatches. The tone shifts radically: no longer sanctions and diplomacy, but active military deterrence.
Before2019
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
↔
After2020
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
↔
After2021-2022
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
Iran used almost exclusively to criticize Biden and Democrats. Very few posts. Trump is no longer president. The Iran topic is evoked as an example of what worked before and no longer does. Near-complete silence (only 4 posts in 2022, 2021 absent entirely).
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
↔
After2023
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
Iran used as a mirror to validate his own presidency. The October 7, 2023 Hamas attack becomes an opportunity to argue: 'This would never have happened under me — Biden let Iran and Hamas out of the cage.' Frame of legacy and the counterfactual.
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
↔
After2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
Iran as total electoral ammunition. 'RUSSIA NEVER INVADED UKRAINE UNDER TRUMP! IRAN NEVER INVADED ISRAEL UNDER TRUMP!' becomes a verbatim mantra. Accusations of Iran-Harris collusion following FBI revelations about hacking. Iran is used to construct the narrative of his own indispensability.
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
Back as president, Trump resumes the ultimatum-with-diplomatic-window frame. 'I want Iran to be a great Country, but without nuclear weapons.' A 60-day ultimatum is issued. Pressure on Houthis as proxy leverage. Iran is treated as a recalcitrant but not wholly irredeemable interlocutor.
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
The June 13 post ('Today is day 61. I told them what to do') marks the expiry of the ultimatum. Within fewer than 10 days Trump announces strikes on nuclear sites. This is the turning point from deterrence strategy to massive military action.
Before2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
Within 48 hours Trump moves from announcing strikes ('obliteration') to announcing the ceasefire with both Israel and Iran. The frame reverses entirely: from war to historic peace, with Trump as the triumphant mediator.
Before2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
↔
After2025-June
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
Strikes on nuclear sites (Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan) as 'mission accomplished'. Then, almost simultaneously: ceasefire and a peace narrative. A paradoxical frame: 'We destroyed everything and now there is peace — thanks to me.' Destruction is presented as the precondition for peace, not as a diplomatic failure.
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
↔
After2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
Iran as a historic victory to be defended against Fake News. Trump seeks a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. He builds the 'peace through strength' narrative as a proven doctrine. Little substantively new content on Iran.
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
Protests in Iran reopen the topic. Trump positions himself as defender of the Iranian people ('locked and loaded'). Then introduces 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran. Then deploys an armada. The frame oscillates between 'I want Iran to be free' and 'I am ready to destroy them again'.
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
Khamenei's death (February 28, 2026) reopens the conflict. Trump celebrates it as 'justice' and relaunches the war narrative. 'Operation Epic Fury' follows in March. The 2025 ceasefire had not closed the chapter.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
After weeks of 'unconditional surrender only', Trump announces in all-caps 'very good and productive conversations' with Iran. The war frame gives way to the negotiation frame. The 'new regime' Iran is suddenly treated as a legitimate interlocutor.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
The April 8 posts mark the final transition: ceasefire, cooperation on non-proliferation, sanctions relief, vision of the 'Golden Age of the Middle East'. The absolute enemy of March becomes the partner of April in under three weeks.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
↔
After2026-March
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
Operation 'Epic Fury'. Systematic destruction of navy, air force, Kharg Island, nuclear sites. Demand for unconditional surrender. Criticism of NATO and European allies who do not participate. The frame is one of total war legitimized by the anti-nuclear and anti-terrorism objectives.
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
↔
After2026-April (1-8)
Within days: ceasefire, announcement of joint US-Iran work on non-proliferation, sanctions and tariffs as diplomatic levers, 50% tariffs on anyone arming Iran. The April 8 post is almost utopian: 'Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process.' The absolute enemy of March has become the potential partner of April. An extreme communicative transition.
Definitive ceasefire, regime change accomplished, opening toward reconstruction. The new-regime Iran becomes almost a partner. Trump presents himself as the architect of peace and future Middle Eastern prosperity. The final frame is the 'Golden Age of the Middle East'.
Within days: ceasefire, announcement of joint US-Iran work on non-proliferation, sanctions and tariffs as diplomatic levers, 50% tariffs on anyone arming Iran. The April 8 post is almost utopian: 'Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process.' The absolute enemy of March has become the potential partner of April. An extreme communicative transition.
Three World Class American Destroyers just transited, very successfully, out of the Strait of Hormuz, under fire. There was no damage done to the three Destroyers, but great damage done to the Iranian attackers. They were completely destroyed along with numerous small boats, which are being used to take the place of their fully decapitated Navy. These boats went to the bottom of the Sea, quickly and efficiently. Missiles were shot at our Destroyers, and were easily knocked down. Likewise, drones came, and were incinerated while in the air. They dropped ever so beautifully down to the Ocean, very much like a butterfly dropping to its grave! A normal Country would have allowed these Destroyers to pass, but Iran is not a normal Country. They are led by LUNATICS, and if they had the chance to use a Nuclear Weapon, they would do it, without question — But they’ll never have that opportunity and, just like we knocked them out again today, we’ll knock them out a lot harder, and a lot more violently, in the future, if they don’t get their Deal signed, FAST! Our three Destroyers, with their wonderful Crews, will now rejoin our Naval Blockade, which is truly a “Wall of Steel.” President DONALD J. TRUMP
I had a great call with The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen. We discussed many topics, including that we are completely united that Iran can never have a Nuclear Weapon. We agreed that a regime that kills its own people cannot control a bomb that can kill millions. I’ve been waiting patiently for the EU to fulfill their side of the Historic Trade Deal we agreed in Turnberry, Scotland, the largest Trade Deal, ever! A promise was made that the EU would deliver their side of the Deal and, as per Agreement, cut their Tariffs to ZERO! I agreed to give her until our Country’s 250th Birthday or, unfortunately, their Tariffs would immediately jump to much higher levels. Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP
Assuming Iran agrees to give what has been agreed to, which is, perhaps, a big assumption, the already legendary Epic Fury will be at an end, and the highly effective Blockade will allow the Hormuz Strait to be OPEN TO ALL, including Iran. If they don’t agree, the bombing starts, and it will be, sadly, at a much higher level and intensity than it was before. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Based on the request of Pakistan and other Countries, the tremendous Military Success that we have had during the Campaign against the Country of Iran and, additionally, the fact that Great Progress has been made toward a Complete and Final Agreement with Representatives of Iran, we have mutually agreed that, while the Blockade will remain in full force and effect, Project Freedom (The Movement of Ships through the Strait of Hormuz) will be paused for a short period of time to see whether or not the Agreement can be finalized and signed. President DONALD J. TRUMP
Iran has taken some shots at unrelated Nations with respect to the Ship Movement, PROJECT FREEDOM, including a South Korean Cargo Ship. Perhaps it’s time for South Korea to come and join the mission! We’ve shot down seven small Boats or, as they like to call them, “fast” Boats. It’s all they have left. Other than the South Korean Ship, there has been, at this moment, no damage going through the Strait. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Dan Caine, will have a News Conference tomorrow morning. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Countries from all over the World, almost all of which are not involved in the Middle Eastern dispute going on so visibly, and violently, for all to see, have asked the United States if we could help free up their Ships, which are locked up in the Strait of Hormuz, on something which they have absolutely nothing to do with — They are merely neutral and innocent bystanders! For the good of Iran, the Middle East, and the United States, we have told these Countries that we will guide their Ships safely out of these restricted Waterways, so that they can freely and ably get on with their business. Again, these are Ships from areas of the World that are not in any way involved with that which is currently taking place in the Middle East. I have told my Representatives to inform them that we will use best efforts to get their Ships and Crews safely out of the Strait. In all cases, they said they will not be returning until the area becomes safe for navigation, and everything else. This process, Project Freedom, will begin Monday morning, Middle East time. I am fully aware that my Representatives are having very positive discussions with the Country of Iran, and that these discussions could lead to something very positive for all. The Ship movement is merely meant to free up people, companies, and Countries that have done absolutely nothing wrong — They are victims of circumstance. This is a Humanitarian gesture on behalf of the United States, Middle Eastern Countries but, in particular, the Country of Iran. Many of these Ships are running low on food, and everything else necessary for largescale crews to stay on board in a healthy and sanitary manner. I think it would go a long way in showing Goodwill on behalf of all of those who have been fighting so strenuously over the last number of months. If, in any way, this Humanitarian process is interfered with, that interference will, unfortunately, have to be dealt with forcefully. Thank you for your attention to this matter! \nDONALD J. TRUMP\nPRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
I will soon be reviewing the plan that Iran has just sent to us, but can’t imagine that it would be acceptable in that they have not yet paid a big enough price for what they have done to Humanity, and the World, over the last 47 years. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Great job by highly respected Navy Commander Kirk Lippold in interview with Jesse Watters on FoxNews. Very smart and insightful concerning Iran, and more. Thank you, Commander! President DJT
The Chancellor of Germany should spend more time on ending the war with Russia/Ukraine (Where he has been totally ineffective!), and fixing his broken Country, especially Immigration and Energy, and less time on interfering with those that are getting rid of the Iran Nuclear threat, thereby making the World, including Germany, a safer place! President DJT
The Chancellor of Germany, Friedrich Merz, thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon. He doesn’t know what he’s talking about! If Iran had a Nuclear Weapon, the whole World would be held hostage. I am doing something with Iran, right now, that other Nations, or Presidents, should have done long ago. No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Iran has just informed us that they are in a “State of Collapse.” They want us to “Open the Hormuz Strait,” as soon as possible, as they try to figure out their leadership situation (Which I believe they will be able to do!). Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
For those people, fewer in number now than ever before, that are reading The Failing New York Times, or watching Fake News CNN, that think that I am “anxious” to end the War (if you would even call it that!) with Iran, please be advised that I am possibly the least pressured person ever to be in this position. I have all the time in the World, but Iran doesn’t — The clock is ticking! The reason some of the Media is doing so poorly with Subscribers and Viewers is because they no longer have credibility. Iran’s Navy is lying at the bottom of the Sea, their Air Force is demolished, their Anti Aircraft and Radar Weaponry is gone, their leaders are no longer with us, the Blockade is airtight and strong and, from there, it only gets worse — Time is not on their side! A Deal will only be made when it’s appropriate and good for the United States of America, our Allies and, in fact, the rest of the World. President DONALD J. TRUMP
Very true!!! President DJT \nMarc Thiessen: Trump doesn’t need a deal to get what he wants from Iran: https://www. washingtonpost.com/opinions/20 26/04/22/trump-best-move-iran-negotiations/
Iran is having a very hard time figuring out who their leader is! They just don’t know! The infighting is between the “Hardliners,” who have been losing BADLY on the battlefield, and the “Moderates,” who are not very moderate at all (but gaining respect!), is CRAZY! We have total control over the Strait of Hormuz. No ship can enter or leave without the approval of the United States Navy. It is “Sealed up Tight,” until such time as Iran is able to make a DEAL!!! Thank you for your attention to this matter. President DONALD J. TRUMP
Trump says Iran won’t execute 8 women after he demanded their release: https:// nypost.com/2026/04/22/us-news/ trump-says-iran-wont-execute-8-women-after-he-pleaded-for-their-release/
RT: https://truthsocial.com/users/realDonaldTrump/statuses/116442908819175250 Very good news! I have just been informed that the eight women protestors who were going to be executed tonight in Iran will no longer be killed. Four will be released immediately, and four will be sentenced to one month in prison. I very much appreciate that Iran, and its leaders, respected my request, as President of the United States, and terminated the planned execution. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
MORNING GLORY: Will President Trump go full Sherman in the war on Iran?\n https://www. foxnews.com/opinion/morning-gl ory-president-trump-go-full-sherman-war-ira
RT @realDonaldTrump Iran is collapsing financially! They want the Strait of Hormuz opened immediately- Starving for cash! Losing 500 Million Dollars a day. Military and Police complaining that they are not getting paid. SOS!!!
