Read top to bottom: each phase shows the position at that point in time, and each turning point explains the shift from the previous phase to the next one.
Posts analyzed694
Phases16
Turning points8
Coverage2011–2026
Over fifteen years (2011-2026), Trump's position on Iran remained ideologically consistent at its core — Iran as an existential threat, an illegitimate regime, an obstacle to Middle Eastern stability — but underwent radical transformations in communicative register and strategic approach. From an outside critic of Obama (2011-2016), to the president who enacted Maximum Pressure and withdrew from the JCPOA (2017-2020), to direct military escalation including strikes on nuclear sites (2025-2026), culminating in a ceasefire and diplomatic opening framed around regime change. Iran was used systematically as a tool to attack Democrats, as a benchmark for Trump's self-proclaimed superior dealmaking ability, and ultimately as a stage for his personal victory narrative.
Phase 012011-2012
hawkish observer
Iran as a nuclear and regional threat that the Obama administration is too weak to confront. The topic is used as indirect political criticism.
Trump, still a non-political public figure, frames Iran as an immediate nuclear danger requiring strong action ('by any and all means necessary'). He criticizes Obama's lack of resolve and links Iran to Iraqi oil and American weakness. The tone is that of an outside commentator who knows better than those in power. Vocabulary is military and deterrence-focused.
Trump, still a non-political public figure, frames Iran as an immediate nuclear danger requiring strong action ('by any and all means necessary'). He criticizes Obama's lack of resolve and links Iran to Iraqi oil and American weakness. The tone is that of an outside commentator who knows better than those in power. Vocabulary is military and deterrence-focused.
↔
After2013-2014
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
Iran as a negotiating partner to be dealt with from a position of strength. Obama is portrayed as an incompetent and desperate negotiator. Trump presents himself as a master dealmaker. The Iran-Iraq-oil triad becomes a recurring refrain.
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
↔
After2015-2016
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
Obama's Iran deal as a 'disaster', 'humiliation', 'deal of weakness'. The topic is actively used in the presidential campaign as a symbol of Democratic incompetence. Iran appears on lists of 'Hillary's failures' and as proof of American weakness on the world stage.
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
With the nuclear deal imminent and then signed in July 2015, Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. He ceased being an outside commentator and became an anti-deal activist, physically attending the protest rally in Washington.
Before2013-2014
With nuclear negotiations underway, Trump focuses on criticizing American negotiating technique. He uses business language ('great deal', 'desperate', 'strengthen sanctions'). He openly criticizes Kerry and cites Netanyahu as an authoritative voice. The throughline is: don't sign now, increase pressure, you will get more. The detained Christian pastor introduces the humanitarian/hostage angle that will recur throughout.
↔
After2015-2016
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
As the JCPOA approached and was signed (July 2015), Trump sharply increased posting frequency and intensity. Vocabulary radicalized: 'terrible deal', 'stupid', 'laughing stock'. He physically attended the anti-deal rally in Washington. He criticized Republicans for not blocking the deal. Iran was inserted into a broader narrative of American foreign policy failure. The $150 billion figure and the $400 million in cash became fixed refrains.
↔
After2017
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
Iran as a regime strengthened by Obama that must now be contained. The frame of 'Iran on its last legs before the deal' emerges. Trump begins using the topic to delegitimize internal opponents (Corker). Language becomes more presidential but retains aggression.
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
↔
After2018
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
JCPOA withdrawal as an act of historical correction. Iran as a terrorist state to be 'choked off'. Maximum Pressure presented as a superior alternative to the deal. Obama as the primary scapegoat. Kerry is attacked for continuing 'shadow diplomacy'.
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
Formal JCPOA withdrawal. The May 8, 2018 White House post inaugurates the Maximum Pressure phase as state policy, no longer merely a personal position. The frame shifts from 'Obama is wrong' to 'I am correcting this'.
Before2017
As president, Trump does not attack Iran militarily but consolidates the narrative: the JCPOA was a catastrophe that refinanced the regime. Iranian threats to neighbors, ballistic missile tests, and Houthi support are all used to justify the upcoming withdrawal. A post linking North Korea and Iran as informal allies introduces a new frame. Low posting density: a context-building phase.
↔
After2018
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
May 2018 marks the formal turning point: withdrawal from the JCPOA. Trump frames the action as liberation of the Iranian people and defense of Israel. Vocabulary becomes more geopolitical: sanctions, Saudi oil, regional destabilization. The 'strength' frame replaces the 'criticism' frame: no longer 'Obama is wrong' but 'I am fixing what needed to be fixed'.
↔
After2019
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
Iran under maximum pressure but with the door open to negotiation. Oscillation between war-like tones ('be careful with the threats') and signals of dialogue readiness ('sanctions come off... they become productive'). The hostage issue returns as a negotiating lever.
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
↔
After2020
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
January 2020 is the hottest moment: Soleimani's killing, Iranian missile retaliation, war risk. Trump manages the narrative publicly with near-real-time posts. First a war frame ('we will strike back'), then de-escalation ('all is well'), then support for the Iranian people against the regime.
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
The Soleimani killing is the first direct kinetic act against Iran. Posts become real-time war dispatches. The tone shifts radically: no longer sanctions and diplomacy, but active military deterrence.
Before2019
The richest and most contradictory year. Trump alternates explicit threats with offers of unconditional talks. After the near-shootdown of a US drone (June 2019), he almost ordered strikes then pulled back — this ambiguity surfaces in the posts. The dominant frame is that of the 'great negotiator who doesn't want war but is ready for anything'. High density of tactical rhetoric.
↔
After2020
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
The killing of Soleimani (January 3, 2020) transforms posts into real-time war dispatches. Trump notifies Congress via Twitter. When Iran responds with missiles on Iraqi bases, the 'All is well!' message is almost comic in its simplicity. The regime-vs-people dichotomy becomes fully established here. High density, high strategic significance.
↔
After2021-2022
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
Iran used almost exclusively to criticize Biden and Democrats. Very few posts. Trump is no longer president. The Iran topic is evoked as an example of what worked before and no longer does. Near-complete silence (only 4 posts in 2022, 2021 absent entirely).
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
Dataset is very sparse. 2021 is entirely missing (likely due to the Twitter ban post-January 6). The few 2022 posts on Truth Social use Iran as a peripheral topic (elections, censorship, Twitter files). Low confidence for this phase.
↔
After2023
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
Iran used as a mirror to validate his own presidency. The October 7, 2023 Hamas attack becomes an opportunity to argue: 'This would never have happened under me — Biden let Iran and Hamas out of the cage.' Frame of legacy and the counterfactual.
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
The October 7 attack reignites the topic forcefully. Trump shares links to op-eds confirming his narrative (Iran emboldened by Biden, JCPOA withdrawal as a success). He produces few original substantive posts but amplifies aligned voices. Iran returns as a political weapon against Biden and Harris in the 2024 race.
↔
After2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
Iran as total electoral ammunition. 'RUSSIA NEVER INVADED UKRAINE UNDER TRUMP! IRAN NEVER INVADED ISRAEL UNDER TRUMP!' becomes a verbatim mantra. Accusations of Iran-Harris collusion following FBI revelations about hacking. Iran is used to construct the narrative of his own indispensability.
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
Back as president, Trump resumes the ultimatum-with-diplomatic-window frame. 'I want Iran to be a great Country, but without nuclear weapons.' A 60-day ultimatum is issued. Pressure on Houthis as proxy leverage. Iran is treated as a recalcitrant but not wholly irredeemable interlocutor.
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
The June 13 post ('Today is day 61. I told them what to do') marks the expiry of the ultimatum. Within fewer than 10 days Trump announces strikes on nuclear sites. This is the turning point from deterrence strategy to massive military action.
Before2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
Within 48 hours Trump moves from announcing strikes ('obliteration') to announcing the ceasefire with both Israel and Iran. The frame reverses entirely: from war to historic peace, with Trump as the triumphant mediator.
Before2024
Electoral year: Iran is cited almost exclusively in electoral terms. The all-caps posts listing countries that 'invaded no one' under Trump appear at least twice identically. Accusations of Iranian interference in the Harris campaign become a standalone sub-topic. Medium confidence given the degree of electoral instrumentalization over substantive policy content.
↔
After2025-Jan/May
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
In the early months of his second term, Trump offers Iran a diplomatic exit while increasing indirect military pressure (Houthis, Hormuz). The tone is that of a stern father giving a last chance. The February 5, 2025 post ('I want Iran to be a great and successful Country') represents the maximum point of diplomatic openness, subsequently contradicted by the 60-day ultimatum and the June military strikes.
↔
After2025-June
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
Strikes on nuclear sites (Fordow, Natanz, Esfahan) as 'mission accomplished'. Then, almost simultaneously: ceasefire and a peace narrative. A paradoxical frame: 'We destroyed everything and now there is peace — thanks to me.' Destruction is presented as the precondition for peace, not as a diplomatic failure.
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
June 2025 is the military climax of the second term. Trump personally announces the strikes, describes the obliteration of nuclear sites, threatens massive retaliation ('FAR GREATER'), then within days announces the ceasefire, with both Israel and Iran coming to him 'almost simultaneously' asking for peace. The 'dealmaker who wins wars by fighting them' frame reaches completion here.
↔
After2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
Iran as a historic victory to be defended against Fake News. Trump seeks a Nobel Peace Prize nomination. He builds the 'peace through strength' narrative as a proven doctrine. Little substantively new content on Iran.
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
Protests in Iran reopen the topic. Trump positions himself as defender of the Iranian people ('locked and loaded'). Then introduces 25% tariffs on countries trading with Iran. Then deploys an armada. The frame oscillates between 'I want Iran to be free' and 'I am ready to destroy them again'.
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
Khamenei's death (February 28, 2026) reopens the conflict. Trump celebrates it as 'justice' and relaunches the war narrative. 'Operation Epic Fury' follows in March. The 2025 ceasefire had not closed the chapter.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
After weeks of 'unconditional surrender only', Trump announces in all-caps 'very good and productive conversations' with Iran. The war frame gives way to the negotiation frame. The 'new regime' Iran is suddenly treated as a legitimate interlocutor.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
The April 8 posts mark the final transition: ceasefire, cooperation on non-proliferation, sanctions relief, vision of the 'Golden Age of the Middle East'. The absolute enemy of March becomes the partner of April in under three weeks.
Before2025-Jul/Dec
After the June ceasefire, Iran-related posts become primarily defensive against media criticism and celebratory of the victory. Third-party citations (Stone, Levin, Fox News) list the 'peaces achieved'. The dataset shows reduced frequency but increased self-referentiality.
↔
After2026-Jan/Feb
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
January–February 2026: protests in Iran bring Trump back into the 'liberator' frame. The cancellation of mass hangings is greeted with public gratitude. Then escalation: tariffs, armada, death of Khamenei (February 2026) celebrated as justice. The ground is laid for a new military operation. Vocabulary returns to the military and ultimatum register.
↔
After2026-March
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
Operation 'Epic Fury'. Systematic destruction of navy, air force, Kharg Island, nuclear sites. Demand for unconditional surrender. Criticism of NATO and European allies who do not participate. The frame is one of total war legitimized by the anti-nuclear and anti-terrorism objectives.
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
March 2026 is the absolute peak of the conflict in the posts. Trump personally describes military operations, threatens power plants and bridges, rejects Iranian ceasefire requests with 'Too Late!', then announces negotiations with the 'new regime'. Vocabulary is that of a war communiqué: 'obliterated', 'decimated', 'unconditional surrender'. The shift toward talks begins at month's end.
↔
After2026-April (1-8)
Within days: ceasefire, announcement of joint US-Iran work on non-proliferation, sanctions and tariffs as diplomatic levers, 50% tariffs on anyone arming Iran. The April 8 post is almost utopian: 'Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process.' The absolute enemy of March has become the potential partner of April. An extreme communicative transition.
Definitive ceasefire, regime change accomplished, opening toward reconstruction. The new-regime Iran becomes almost a partner. Trump presents himself as the architect of peace and future Middle Eastern prosperity. The final frame is the 'Golden Age of the Middle East'.
Within days: ceasefire, announcement of joint US-Iran work on non-proliferation, sanctions and tariffs as diplomatic levers, 50% tariffs on anyone arming Iran. The April 8 post is almost utopian: 'Big money will be made. Iran can start the reconstruction process.' The absolute enemy of March has become the potential partner of April. An extreme communicative transition.
The Fake News Media refuses to report how EFFECTIVE the U.S. Naval BLOCKADE is, the most successful Blockade in the history of Naval Warfare. NOTHING GETS THROUGH unless we want it to. IT IS A STEEL WALL! Iran is doing ZERO business, not paying their military, or any of their bills, and quickly becoming a FAILED NATION! Lots of oil is getting out. Praise be to Allah! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Iran’s Military is a complete and total mess. Much of it, like their Navy and Air Force, doesn’t even exist anymore - They have been completely defeated. Iran is all talk and no action. The Bully of the Middle East is DEAD!!! They’ve taken too long to negotiate a deal that would have been great for them, now they will have to pay the price!!! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Both sides, Israel and Iran, are looking to do an immediate CEASEFIRE! Final negotiations on “Peace” are proceeding, subject to ignorance or stupidity getting in its way. The Blockade will remain in place, and in full force and effect, until a “Final Deal” is reached. Things should move quickly. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
Yesterday, in a meaningless vote, the House voted, 4 bad Republicans and all of the Dumocrats, to limit my War Powers, right in the middle of my final negotiations to end the War with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Who would do such an unpatriotic thing. They know where the negotiations stand. The Democrats are fueled by Trump Derangement Syndrome. They would rather have our Country fail than give me another, of many, victories. The four Republicans, that’s a whole other story - They’re GRANDSTANDERS! They should be ashamed of themselves. MAGA!!! President DJT
Fake News Reports that the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the U.S.A., stopped speaking a few days ago are false and erroneous. The conversations between us have been going on continuously, including four days ago, three days ago, two days ago, one day ago, and today. Where they lead, one never knows, but as I told Iran, “It’s time, one way or another, for you to make a Deal. You’ve been doing this for 47 years, and it cannot be allowed to go on any longer!” President DONALD J. TRUMP
If Iran surrenders, admits their Navy is gone and resting at the bottom of the sea, and their Air Force is no longer with us, and if their entire Military walks out of Tehran, weapons dropped and hands held high, each shouting “I surrender, I surrender” while wildly waving the representative White Flag, and if their entire remaining Leadership signs all necessary “Documents of Surrender,” and admit their defeat to the great power and force of the magnificent U.S.A., The Failing New York Times, The China Street Journal (WSJ!), Corrupt and now Irrelevant CNN, and all other members of the Fake News Media, will headline that Iran had a Masterful and Brilliant Victory over The United States of America, it wasn’t even close. The Dumacrats and Media have totally lost their way. They have gone absolutely CRAZY!!! President DJT
RT @NewtGingrich After spending this week reviewing the Iranian war I am now convinced President Trump is on the edge of an historic victory. The real breakthrough for me came as I reviewed President Trump’s decisions and maneuvers not from the standpoint of American unilateralism but from the standpoint of the leader of a remarkable historic coalition, the largest coalition ever put together in the modern Middle East. Everyone understands that Israel is an important ally. What is little discussed is the depth of support from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region. It has to be sobering for the Iranian dictatorship to realize that it does not have a single ally willing to challenge the American naval blockade. Slowly, gradually, timidly, our European allies are lining up to help with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. A great deal of President Trump’s maneuvers against Iran make sense once he is seen as a coalition leader and not just as a unilateral American President. I spent a lot of the last couple weeks reviewing kinetic options including wining the battle of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz and if necessary using the shocking and shattering level of force President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger used against Hanoi and Haiphong in Christmas 1972 (which both leaders believed convinced the North Vietnamese to agree to a truce and the freeing of American POWs). If this were a unilateral American campaign I could enthusiastically support a more aggressive kinetic campaign. However it is also clear it would shatter the coalition because our Arab allies are convinced Iran could still do enormous damage to their oil fields and infrastructure. Coalitions are inherently slower than unilateral campaigns. However coalitions ultimately bring vastly more power to the fight. I am as frustrated as everyone else by the pace of talking with the dictatorship but having reviewed the correlation of forces and the options available to the coalition on one side and the Iranian religiously motivated dictatorship on the other I am prepared to assert that President Trump’s coalition leadership (something almost none of his critics want to acknowledge) is within reach of an enormous historic victory. And if the Iranian dictatorship ultimately proves it is hopelessly committed to a suicidal position there will be plenty of time for a kinetic campaign of enormous power and effectiveness. Either way we are on the edge of an astonishing victory for our values and for a safer Middle East.
Iran really wants to make a deal, and it will be a good one for the U.S.A. and those that are with us. But don’t the Dumocrats, and various seemingly unpatriotic Republicans, understand that it is MUCH tougher for me to properly do my job and negotiate, when political hacks keep negatively “chirping,” at levels never seen before, over and over again, that I should move faster, or move slower, or go to war, or not go to war, or whatever. Just sit back and relax, it will all work out well in the end - It always does! President DJT
Fake News CNN said today, routinely, that my Iran Nuclear Deal doesn’t talk about Nuclear, when actually it states, very clearly, that Iran will not have a Nuclear Weapon. It then goes on, in very strong and lengthy detail, to discuss various other aspects of Nuclear. In fact, that’s what most of the agreement is about. CNN, and so many others in the Fake News Media, is a Low Ratings disaster. Even with new ownership, it is unlikely to ever get better!!! President DJT
RT @NewtGingrich After spending this week reviewing the Iranian war I am now convinced President Trump is on the edge of an historic victory. The real breakthrough for me came as I reviewed President Trump’s decisions and maneuvers not from the standpoint of American unilateralism but from the standpoint of the leader of a remarkable historic coalition, the largest coalition ever put together in the modern Middle East. Everyone understands that Israel is an important ally. What is little discussed is the depth of support from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region. It has to be sobering for the Iranian dictatorship to realize that it does not have a single ally willing to challenge the American naval blockade. Slowly, gradually, timidly, our European allies are lining up to help with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. A great deal of President Trump’s maneuvers against Iran make sense once he is seen as a coalition leader and not just as a unilateral American President. I spent a lot of the last couple weeks reviewing kinetic options including wining the battle of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz and if necessary using the shocking and shattering level of force President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger used against Hanoi and Haiphong in Christmas 1972 (which both leaders believed convinced the North Vietnamese to agree to a truce and the freeing of American POWs). If this were a unilateral American campaign I could enthusiastically support a more aggressive kinetic campaign. However it is also clear it would shatter the coalition because our Arab allies are convinced Iran could still do enormous damage to their oil fields and infrastructure. Coalitions are inherently slower than unilateral campaigns. However coalitions ultimately bring vastly more power to the fight. I am as frustrated as everyone else by the pace of talking with the dictatorship but having reviewed the correlation of forces and the options available to the coalition on one side and the Iranian religiously motivated dictatorship on the other I am prepared to assert that President Trump’s coalition leadership (something almost none of his critics want to acknowledge) is within reach of an enormous historic victory. And if the Iranian dictatorship ultimately proves it is hopelessly committed to a suicidal position there will be plenty of time for a kinetic campaign of enormous power and effectiveness. Either way we are on the edge of an astonishing victory for our values and for a safer Middle East.
RT @NewtGingrich After spending this week reviewing the Iranian war I am now convinced President Trump is on the edge of an historic victory. The real breakthrough for me came as I reviewed President Trump’s decisions and maneuvers not from the standpoint of American unilateralism but from the standpoint of the leader of a remarkable historic coalition, the largest coalition ever put together in the modern Middle East. Everyone understands that Israel is an important ally. What is little discussed is the depth of support from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region. It has to be sobering for the Iranian dictatorship to realize that it does not have a single ally willing to challenge the American naval blockade. Slowly, gradually, timidly, our European allies are lining up to help with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. A great deal of President Trump’s maneuvers against Iran make sense once he is seen as a coalition leader and not just as a unilateral American President. I spent a lot of the last couple weeks reviewing kinetic options including wining the battle of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz and if necessary using the shocking and shattering level of force President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger used against Hanoi and Haiphong in Christmas 1972 (which both leaders believed convinced the North Vietnamese to agree to a truce and the freeing of American POWs). If this were a unilateral American campaign I could enthusiastically support a more aggressive kinetic campaign. However it is also clear it would shatter the coalition because our Arab allies are convinced Iran could still do enormous damage to their oil fields and infrastructure. Coalitions are inherently slower than unilateral campaigns. However coalitions ultimately bring vastly more power to the fight. I am as frustrated as everyone else by the pace of talking with the dictatorship but having reviewed the correlation of forces and the options available to the coalition on one side and the Iranian religiously motivated dictatorship on the other I am prepared to assert that President Trump’s coalition leadership (something almost none of his critics want to acknowledge) is within reach of an enormous historic victory. And if the Iranian dictatorship ultimately proves it is hopelessly committed to a suicidal position there will be plenty of time for a kinetic campaign of enormous power and effectiveness. Either way we are on the edge of an astonishing victory for our values and for a safer Middle East.
RT @NewtGingrich After spending this week reviewing the Iranian war I am now convinced President Trump is on the edge of an historic victory. The real breakthrough for me came as I reviewed President Trump’s decisions and maneuvers not from the standpoint of American unilateralism but from the standpoint of the leader of a remarkable historic coalition, the largest coalition ever put together in the modern Middle East. Everyone understands that Israel is an important ally. What is little discussed is the depth of support from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region. It has to be sobering for the Iranian dictatorship to realize that it does not have a single ally willing to challenge the American naval blockade. Slowly, gradually, timidly, our European allies are lining up to help with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. A great deal of President Trump’s maneuvers against Iran make sense once he is seen as a coalition leader and not just as a unilateral American President. I spent a lot of the last couple weeks reviewing kinetic options including wining the battle of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz and if necessary using the shocking and shattering level of force President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger used against Hanoi and Haiphong in Christmas 1972 (which both leaders believed convinced the North Vietnamese to agree to a truce and the freeing of American POWs). If this were a unilateral American campaign I could enthusiastically support a more aggressive kinetic campaign. However it is also clear it would shatter the coalition because our Arab allies are convinced Iran could still do enormous damage to their oil fields and infrastructure. Coalitions are inherently slower than unilateral campaigns. However coalitions ultimately bring vastly more power to the fight. I am as frustrated as everyone else by the pace of talking with the dictatorship but having reviewed the correlation of forces and the options available to the coalition on one side and the Iranian religiously motivated dictatorship on the other I am prepared to assert that President Trump’s coalition leadership (something almost none of his critics want to acknowledge) is within reach of an enormous historic victory. And if the Iranian dictatorship ultimately proves it is hopelessly committed to a suicidal position there will be plenty of time for a kinetic campaign of enormous power and effectiveness. Either way we are on the edge of an astonishing victory for our values and for a safer Middle East.
RT @realDonaldTrump Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. The Hormuz Strait must be immediately open, no tolls, for unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions. All water mines (bombs), if any, will be terminated (we have removed, through detonation, numerous such mines with our great underwater mine sweepers. Iran will complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left, which will not be many!). Ships caught in the Strait due to our amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade, which will now be lifted, may start the process of “heading home!” Say HELLO to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite President! The enriched material, sometimes referred to as “Nuclear Dust,” which is buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains, caused by our powerful B2 Bomber attack 11 months ago, sitting on top of it, will be unearthed by the United States (which, it is agreed, is the only Country, along with China, with the mechanical capability of doing so!), in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and DESTROYED. No money will be exchanged, until further notice. Other items, of far less importance, have been agreed to. I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP
RT @LeeSmith Who Wants This War? Answer: Winners like Trump \nThat’s epic fury revising in fire and steel 47 years of American defeat at the hands of an anti-American regime that no U.S. president dared to challenge until Trump. Me in Tablet Mag \n https://www. tabletmag.com/sections/news/ar ticles/war-iran-winners-donald-trump
RT @NewtGingrich After spending this week reviewing the Iranian war I am now convinced President Trump is on the edge of an historic victory. The real breakthrough for me came as I reviewed President Trump’s decisions and maneuvers not from the standpoint of American unilateralism but from the standpoint of the leader of a remarkable historic coalition, the largest coalition ever put together in the modern Middle East. Everyone understands that Israel is an important ally. What is little discussed is the depth of support from the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia and other countries in the region. It has to be sobering for the Iranian dictatorship to realize that it does not have a single ally willing to challenge the American naval blockade. Slowly, gradually, timidly, our European allies are lining up to help with the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. A great deal of President Trump’s maneuvers against Iran make sense once he is seen as a coalition leader and not just as a unilateral American President. I spent a lot of the last couple weeks reviewing kinetic options including wining the battle of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz and if necessary using the shocking and shattering level of force President Nixon and Secretary Kissinger used against Hanoi and Haiphong in Christmas 1972 (which both leaders believed convinced the North Vietnamese to agree to a truce and the freeing of American POWs). If this were a unilateral American campaign I could enthusiastically support a more aggressive kinetic campaign. However it is also clear it would shatter the coalition because our Arab allies are convinced Iran could still do enormous damage to their oil fields and infrastructure. Coalitions are inherently slower than unilateral campaigns. However coalitions ultimately bring vastly more power to the fight. I am as frustrated as everyone else by the pace of talking with the dictatorship but having reviewed the correlation of forces and the options available to the coalition on one side and the Iranian religiously motivated dictatorship on the other I am prepared to assert that President Trump’s coalition leadership (something almost none of his critics want to acknowledge) is within reach of an enormous historic victory. And if the Iranian dictatorship ultimately proves it is hopelessly committed to a suicidal position there will be plenty of time for a kinetic campaign of enormous power and effectiveness. Either way we are on the edge of an astonishing victory for our values and for a safer Middle East.
Iran must agree that they will never have a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb. The Hormuz Strait must be immediately open, no tolls, for unrestricted shipping traffic, in both directions. All water mines (bombs), if any, will be terminated (we have removed, through detonation, numerous such mines with our great underwater mine sweepers. Iran will complete the immediate removal and/or detonation of any mines that are left, which will not be many!). Ships caught in the Strait due to our amazing and unprecedented Naval Blockade, which will now be lifted, may start the process of “heading home!” Say HELLO to your wives, husbands, parents, and families from me, your favorite President! The enriched material, sometimes referred to as “Nuclear Dust,” which is buried deep underground with virtually collapsed mountains, caused by our powerful B2 Bomber attack 11 months ago, sitting on top of it, will be unearthed by the United States (which, it is agreed, is the only Country, along with China, with the mechanical capability of doing so!), in close coordination and conjunction with the Islamic Republic of Iran, plus the International Atomic Energy Agency, and DESTROYED. No money will be exchanged, until further notice. Other items, of far less importance, have been agreed to. I will be meeting now, in the Situation Room, to make a final determination. Thank you for your attention to this matter! President DONALD J. TRUMP